Ann Coulter, or as she's known in most of the world, Karl Rove's Pet Tranny, is apparently getting even more desperate for attention. She's aware now that we've stopped giving her creedence and are just letting her forth in the corner like a soiled 3 year old in full trantrumal meltdown. The difference is that the 3 year old calms down after a few and is lovable. Anyway, on her own page Ann states:
Second, let's pause for a moment to observe that two facts are now universally accepted: Liberals are godless and Hillary's husband is a rapist.(emphasis hers - Source: http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=134)My book makes a stark assertion: Liberalism is a godless religion. Hello! Anyone there? I've leapt beyond calling you traitors and am now calling you GODLESS. Apparently, everybody's cool with that. The fact that liberals are godless is not even a controversial point anymore.
No Ann, it's not even controversial, or worth discussing. You've grown shrill and hysterical. I look forward to the day I see you walking down the streets of D.C. pushing a shopping cart full of your unpurchased books and eating leftovers out of the dumpster behind the DNC office.
ps - Ann Coulter's really a man. Pass it on.
It's funny how you've "stopped giving her creedence", yet you've written a page calling her a 3-year old, a tranny, and a man. People tend to do that when they don't want to debate the topics.
If you're going to quote her, at least give her some context.
She's talking about how the media and other liberals gave her "creedence" by flipping out for a week over comments she made about the Jersey Girls, yet none of them seemed to have much to say that she was calling them "godless".
As for her "cart full of your unpurchased books", that's not going to happen since she now has five bestsellers. But it's always fun to wish, isn't it?
I don't think I'm giving her credence merely by mentioning her. Someone sent me the link to her article and I thought it was funny how she was writing with italics "Hello! Anyone there?" It seems to me that she's recognizing that she's become a punchline, or a joke and is railing against it.
If she'd not made such an outrageous statement about the widows she'd not have gotten any airtime at all.
And that's fine because I don't believe she deserves any.
Which is why I don't think it's important to address her assertion that liberals are godless. If I had done that, THEN I would have been giving her credence.