How Long Do You Have To Pay For The Murder Of A Child?

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

I was listening to NPR while I sat in traffic on the Jones Falls Expressway this morning, and they had a story about some of the prisoners that Israel refuses to hand back to the Lebanese. One of the prisoners, Samir Kuntar, was accused and convicted of murdering a father and his four-year-old daughter, among others in a cross-border raid 27 years ago.

Simar's brother was on record saying that he felt that even if he believed everything the Israelis said and that even if his brother had killed both Danny Haran and his daughter Einat, 27 years was more than enough time to spend in jail for those crimes. While I can certainly appreciate someone's desire to see his family member again, I don't see how anyone can say "Yes my brother murdered a child in cold-blood in the middle of the night but he should go free now". It just boggles my mind.

In my head, if someone were to hurt one of my kids, or the children of one of my friends or family members, hell any child in cold blood, with deliberate malice are eligible for the most heinous and horrific punishments available to man. They certainly don't go free. Ever.

More information about the whole affair is also available here.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: How Long Do You Have To Pay For The Murder Of A Child?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mauricereeves.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/819

3 Comments

Wow, this is indeed an emotional subject; maybe too much for a blog comment to address but I'll try.

Let's consider a few mitigating factors that I believe shed some much-needed context upon this scenario:

  • Kantar was 16-years old at the time of the raid, a member of a 4-person guerilla raid organized by the PLF.
  • The raid was an effort of resistance to the Israeli occupation of Kantar's homeland: Lebanon.
  • In letters smuggled out of the Israeli prison, Kandar admitted being part of the raid but denied killing any civilians.
    (source: NPR broadcast).


Compare those contextual details to the U.S. Marines who killed 15 innocent civilians in Haditha back in November 2005:

At 5 p.m. Nov. 19, near the end of one of the most violent days the Marine Corps had experienced in the Upper Euphrates Valley, a call went out for trucks to collect the bodies of 24 Iraqi civilians.

The unit that arrived in the farming town of Haditha found babies, women and children shot in the head and chest. An old man in a wheelchair had been shot nine times. A group of girls, ages 1 to 14, lay dead. Everyone had been killed by gunfire, according to death certificates issued later.

The next day, Capt. Jeffrey S. Pool, a Marine spokesman in Iraq, released a terse statement: Fifteen Iraqis "were killed yesterday from the blast of a roadside bomb in Haditha. Immediately after the bombing, gunmen attacked the convoy with small arms fire. Iraqi army soldiers and Marines returned fire, killing eight insurgents and wounding another."

I'm not justifying Kantar but in comparison to the Haditha incident, it seems rather tame both in scope as well as in motive/intent.

Wow, this is indeed an emotional subject; maybe too much for a blog comment to address but I'll try.

Let's consider a few mitigating factors that I believe shed some much-needed context upon this scenario:

  • Kantar was 16-years old at the time of the raid, a member of a 4-person guerilla raid organized by the PLF.
  • The raid was an effort of resistance to the Israeli occupation of Kantar's homeland: Lebanon.
  • In letters smuggled out of the Israeli prison, Kandar admitted being part of the raid but denied killing any civilians.
    (source: NPR broadcast).


Compare those contextual details to the U.S. Marines who killed 15 innocent civilians in Haditha back in November 2005:

At 5 p.m. Nov. 19, near the end of one of the most violent days the Marine Corps had experienced in the Upper Euphrates Valley, a call went out for trucks to collect the bodies of 24 Iraqi civilians.

The unit that arrived in the farming town of Haditha found babies, women and children shot in the head and chest. An old man in a wheelchair had been shot nine times. A group of girls, ages 1 to 14, lay dead. Everyone had been killed by gunfire, according to death certificates issued later.

The next day, Capt. Jeffrey S. Pool, a Marine spokesman in Iraq, released a terse statement: Fifteen Iraqis "were killed yesterday from the blast of a roadside bomb in Haditha. Immediately after the bombing, gunmen attacked the convoy with small arms fire. Iraqi army soldiers and Marines returned fire, killing eight insurgents and wounding another."

I'm not justifying Kantar but in comparison to the Haditha incident, it seems rather tame both in scope as well as in motive/intent.

I agree, the situation in Haditha is bad, probably worse, and in that case I too support locking up the Marines involved forever. It's just not called for. Period. I understand they get frustrated, they get angry, and so on...so what.

Now, as far as Kantar is concerned, I don't consider his age during the raid to be a mitigating factor, nor his protestations via letters. Millions of criminals around the world claim they "didn't do it". And resistance by killing a four-year-old little girl is still horrible. I have no issue with resistance movements that target the military of the invading force, as long as they limit their actions to the military, but murdering children is just...WRONG.

Leave a comment

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mo published on September 18, 2006 11:55 PM.

Redskins Lose Again was the previous entry in this blog.

New Member Of The Family! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.