I was listening to NPR while I sat in traffic on the Jones Falls Expressway this morning, and they had a story about some of the prisoners that Israel refuses to hand back to the Lebanese. One of the prisoners, Samir Kuntar, was accused and convicted of murdering a father and his four-year-old daughter, among others in a cross-border raid 27 years ago.
Simar's brother was on record saying that he felt that even if he believed everything the Israelis said and that even if his brother had killed both Danny Haran and his daughter Einat, 27 years was more than enough time to spend in jail for those crimes. While I can certainly appreciate someone's desire to see his family member again, I don't see how anyone can say "Yes my brother murdered a child in cold-blood in the middle of the night but he should go free now". It just boggles my mind.
In my head, if someone were to hurt one of my kids, or the children of one of my friends or family members, hell any child in cold blood, with deliberate malice are eligible for the most heinous and horrific punishments available to man. They certainly don't go free. Ever.
More information about the whole affair is also available here.

Wow, this is indeed an emotional subject; maybe too much for a blog comment to address but I'll try.
Let's consider a few mitigating factors that I believe shed some much-needed context upon this scenario:
(source: NPR broadcast).
Compare those contextual details to the U.S. Marines who killed 15 innocent civilians in Haditha back in November 2005:
I'm not justifying Kantar but in comparison to the Haditha incident, it seems rather tame both in scope as well as in motive/intent.
Wow, this is indeed an emotional subject; maybe too much for a blog comment to address but I'll try.
Let's consider a few mitigating factors that I believe shed some much-needed context upon this scenario:
(source: NPR broadcast).
Compare those contextual details to the U.S. Marines who killed 15 innocent civilians in Haditha back in November 2005:
I'm not justifying Kantar but in comparison to the Haditha incident, it seems rather tame both in scope as well as in motive/intent.
I agree, the situation in Haditha is bad, probably worse, and in that case I too support locking up the Marines involved forever. It's just not called for. Period. I understand they get frustrated, they get angry, and so on...so what.
Now, as far as Kantar is concerned, I don't consider his age during the raid to be a mitigating factor, nor his protestations via letters. Millions of criminals around the world claim they "didn't do it". And resistance by killing a four-year-old little girl is still horrible. I have no issue with resistance movements that target the military of the invading force, as long as they limit their actions to the military, but murdering children is just...WRONG.