Many people see a President trying to make people's lives better and help them out. Other people see a president trying to cut through a morass of laws and set up some clear laws for dealing first with privacy, and now spam.
Whether this was done intentionally or not, (though I have my reasons to believe that it was done intentionally), what I see is Bush is setting up a dangerous legal precedent to strip all powers from the States. I'm not the only one echoing these fears. Both of the articles I linked above note that the laws passed by Dubya overrule stricter state laws. How does that protect the consumer?
